Indonesian EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in the Instructional Context

Suci Nugrah Amalia, Abdul Asib, Sri Marmanto

Abstract


The principal goal of L2 education is to enhance learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC). Hence, this survey study was undertaken with the purpose of exploring Indonesian EFL learners’ WTC especially in a classroom context or the so-called Instructional WTC (IWTC) in order to know the conditions triggering their willingness and unwillingness to communicate using L2. This survey applied descriptive quantitative method where 100 EFL learners from three State Universities in Indonesia were involved as the respondents. The respondents are the English students of IAIN Curup Bengkulu, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Surakarta and Universitas Musamus Merauke Papua. Those universities represent three of five major islands in Indonesia. A questionnaire was distributed to the respondents in order to explore their WTC in six IWTC components comprising communicative self-confidence, integrative orientation, situational context of L2 use, topical enticement, learning responsibility, and off-instruction communication. The findings revealed that group size, classroom environment, students’ cohesiveness, familiarity to the topic, degree of topic preparation, classroom seating arrangement, gender, self-awareness, and familiarity with interlocutors were the factors that affected learners’ WTC. Further studies are highly recommended to deeply explore the teaching activities done by teachers by considering the influential factors of learners’ willingness and unwillingness to communicate as an effort to maximize their WTC.

Keywords


Indonesian EFL Learners, IWTC, L2 Classroom, WTC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validation. Communications Monographs, 43(1), 60-69.

Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468-479.

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.

Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2005). The effects of intercultural contact and tourism on language attitudes and language learning motivation. Journal of language and social psychology, 24(4), 327-357.

Dornyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). ¨ Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eddy-U, M. (2015). Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate. System, 50, 43-55.

Gardner, R. C. (1988). “Attitudes and Motivation.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 135–148.

Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.

Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016).

Willingness to Communicate in English: A Microsystem Model in the Iranian

EFL Classroom Context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180.

Khatib, M., & Nourzadeh, S. (2015). Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3), 266-283.

Khatibi, M. B., & Zakeri, J. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate across different context-and receiver-types. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98 (1). 932-939.

Lahuerta, A. C. (2014). Factors affecting willingness to communicate in a Spanish university context. International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 39-55.

Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5).

Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63-73.

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.

McCorskey, J. C., & McVetta, R. W. (1978). Classroom seating arrangements: Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27(2), 99-111.

McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and personality, 5(2), 19.

Neer, M. R., & Kircher, W. F. (1989). Apprehensives’ perception of classroom factors influencing their class participation. Communication Research Reports, 6(1), 70-77.

Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654-671.

Peng, J. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: A cultural perspective. In J. Liu (Ed.), English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives, and standards (pp. 250–269). London: Continuum.

Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self-system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433-443.

Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language learning, 60(4), 834-876.

Prasetyanto, B. T., Wibawani, D. A., Wardani, E. N., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Teacher’s Reinforcements Affecting Students’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC): A Photovoice in EFL Classroom. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 4(1), 57-71.

Prihartanti, N. (2017). Willingness to communicate in English: A case study of Indonesian university students. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 25(1), 71-81.

Vongsila, V., & Reinders, H. (2016). Making Asian Learners Talk: Encouraging Willingness to Communicate. RELC Journal, 47(3), 331–347.

Yashima, T. (2002). “Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Japanese EFL Context.” The Modern Language Journal 86 (1): 54–66.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v4i2.167

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics); Email: indonesianefl@gmail.com; Web: www.indonesian-efl-journal.org

Creative Commons License
IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics) by http://indonesian-efl-journal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and Abstracted BY:

 

  Hasil gambar untuk gambar moraref