Digital Video Project: An Authentic Assessment to Assess Students’ Speaking Skills

Sumardi Sumardi, Rohmatul ‘Adzima, Andik Nur Wijaya

Abstract


This study was conducted to explore the use of digital video projects and to describe students' perceptions towards digital video project in the speaking assessment. The recorded students' speaking performances were assessed based on a speaking rubric that was adopted and modified to meet the requirements in authentic assessment using digital video projects. The criteria focused on three aspects, they are content, delivery, and creativity. This research involved 25 private university students from non-English departments who joined the English course at Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta. The study utilized a content analysis method with a qualitative approach. The data were collected through the analysis of students' speaking rubric to explore the use of digital video project in speaking assessment and open-ended questionnaire to know the students' perception towards digital video project in the speaking assessment. In completing the project, the students follow four steps: starting the project, developing the project, reporting to the class, and assessing the project. The findings showed that digital video project helps learners to improve their ability to create a right introduction, keep their voice volume and expression, and promote their creativity to make interesting videos. The implication of the research is by employing the digital video project they create, students learn to speak and explore their ideas.

Keywords


Authentic assessment, digital-video project, speaking skill, students’ perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksel, A.& Gurman-Kahraman, F. (2014). Video project assignments and their effectiveness on foreign language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 141, pp. 319-324.

Barker, E. L. (1993). Questioning the technical quality of performance assessment. The School Administrator 50 (11), 12-16.

Barron, B., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on the problem and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3/4), 271–311.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). San Fransisco: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Longman.

Chaney, A.L.& Burk, T. L. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn&Bacon.

Clement, R. (1980). Ethnicity, Contact and Communicative Competence in a Second Language. Language - Social Psychological Perspectives, pp. 147-154.

Cresswell, John W. (2008). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Third edition. New Jersey: Pearson.

Ekalestari, S., Azmi, M. N. L., & Putri, F. (2018). The Perception of Learning English By Undergraduate Students. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1995

Fauziati, E. (2014). Methods of Teaching English as A Foreign Language: Traditional Method, Designer Method, Communicative Method, and Scientific Approach. Surakarta: Era Pustaka Utama.

Hafner, C. A. & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering Learner Autonomy in English for Science: A Collaborative Digital Video Project in a Technological Learning Environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15 (3), pp. 68-86.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach Speaking. New York: Edinburg Gate.

Hasanah, Y. A. (2019). Enhancing The Speaking Performance Of Efl College Students Through Video Projects. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v12i1.4425

Huang, H. (2015). The Effects of Video Projects on EFL Learners ’ Language Learning and Motivation : An Evaluative Study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (March), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2015010104

Hung, C., Hwang, G., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence, and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 368–379.

Kearney, M. & Schuck, S. (2006). Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22 (2), 189–208.

Koc, Mustafa. (2011). Let's make a movie: Investigating pre-service teachers' reflections on using video-recorded role-playing cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (1), pp. 95-106.

Kumar, R. (2010). Perception. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/25022575/The-Concept-of-Perception#scribd.

Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 211-234.

Lewis, J. (2016). Seven benefits of video-based assessment. Retrieved from file:///F:/Journal%20articles%20and%20submissions/Springer%20edited%20book%20%20chapters%20etc/7%20Benefits%20of%20VideoBased%20Assessment%20_%20D2L%20Australia,%20New%20Zealand%20&%20Asia.html.

MacIntyre, P.D. & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001.

Masats, D.& Melinda, D. (2011). Rethinking the use of video in teacher education: A holistic approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (7), pp. 1151-1162.

Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (25), 1-10.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage Publication, Inc.

Nikitina, L. (2009). Student video project as a means to practice constructivist pedagogy in the foreign language classroom. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, Jil. 24, 165–176, 2009.

Nitko, A. J. (1983). Educational test and measurement: An introduction. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Nursanti, Y. (2016). Students’ Perception of Teacher’s Bilingual Language Use in an English Classroom. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 159–176.

O’Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: practical approaches for teachers. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

Phillips, D., Burwood, S., & Dunford, H. (1999).Projects with young learners.New York: Oxford University Press.

Phillips, E. (1982). Student video production. In M. Geddes and G. Sturtridge (Eds.). Video in the language classroom. London: Heinemann Education.

Porter, D., & Roberts, J. (1987). Authentic listening activities. In M. H. Long, & J. C. Richards, (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 177–187). New York: Newbury House.

Quianthy, R. L. (1990). Communication is Life: Essential College Sophomore Speaking and Listening Competencies. Speech Communication Association.

Reinders, H. & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design In N. Harwood (Ed.) English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 58-80.

Richards, J. (1971). Error Analysis and Second Language Strategies. ERIC - ED048579.

Rukmini, D.& Saputri, L.A. (2017). The Authentic Assessment to Measure Students' English productive Skills Based on the 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (2), pp. 263-273.

Secules, T.C. & Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 480–490.

Shrosbree, M. (2008). Digital Video in the Language Classroom. The JALT CALL Journal, 4 (1), pp. 75-84.

Sobur, A. (2003). Psikologi Umum. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Swanson, P., & Early, P. (2008). Digital recordings and assessment: An alternative for measuring oral proficiency. In A. Moeller, J. Theiler, & S. Betta (Eds.), CSCTFL Report (pp. 129-143). Eau Claire, WI: Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Available at:http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/mcl_facpub/3/.

Whitton, N. (2009). Learning with Digital Games: A Practical Guide to Engaging Students in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Japanese EFL Context. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (1), pp. 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136.

Yashima, T et al. (2004). The Influence of Attitudes and Affect on Willingness to Communicate and Second Language Communication. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 54 (1), pp. 119-152.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.217

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics); Email: indonesianefl@gmail.com; Web: www.indonesian-efl-journal.org

Creative Commons License
IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics) by http://indonesian-efl-journal.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and Abstracted BY:

 

  Hasil gambar untuk gambar moraref