Perlocutionary Act of Euphemism in Indonesian Presidential Election Debate 2019
Keywords:
debate, euphemism, Perlocutionary Act
Abstract
Presidential election debate attracts public attention toward general election. Through the presidential debate, euphemism is uttered by candidates, and it creates effect to other debaters. This paper is focused on examining effect (perlocutionary act)of euphemism in presidential election debate 2019. The corpus covers the utterances containing euphemism and their responses as the effect produced by the candidates in the prime presidential election debate 2019. The methods used in analyzing data were pragmatics identity method and referential method. The results show that the effect of using euphemism includes verbal perlocutionary act acceptance namely agreement and verbal perlocutionary act refusal includes contradiction, rebuttal, disagreement, denial and criticism. Verbal perlocutionary act acceptance is only expressed by a candidate from the same party as support. However, the verbal perlocutionary act of refusal is expressed by candidates respectively. It indicates that each candidate has different ideology and communication strategy.References
Agustina & Bahrani. (2016). The implementation of British parliamentary debating in Mulawarman debate society. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics , 79-97. Vol. 1 No. 1, 2016. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.vlil.6
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991 ). Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language used as Shield and Weapon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Andrasari, L. (2017). Tindak tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Pilkada Kabupaten Sambas Tahun 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa Vol 6, No 4 .
Arif, N. F. (2015). Social and Cognitive Implications of Using Euphemisms in English. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 5, No. 6 , 151-156.
Astuti, A. (2016). Eufemisme bahasa pendukung Capres RI dalam akun Facebook:Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Universitas Andalas.
Austin, G. (1962). How To Do Things with words. Massachusetts: Harvad University Press Cambridge.
Brown, P. a. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burridge, K. (2012:76). Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and. Journal in English Lexicology , 65-92.
Burridge, K., & Allan, K. (2003). Taboo and the Censoring of language. New York: Cmabridge University Press.
Chaer, A. (1995). Sosiolinguistik : Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Citraresmana, E. (2019). Konsep makna kita dan kami dalam debat capres bulan Januari 2019: Kajian Semantik Kognitif melalui studi korpus. Metalingua, Vol. 18 No. 2 , 103-112.
Crespo Fernández, E. (2005). Euphemistic Strategies In Politeness And Face. Pragmalingüística, .
Dipodjojo, A. (1982 : 59). Komunikasi Lisan. Yogyakarta: P.D Lukman.
Fernandez, C. (2014). Euphemism and political discoursein the British regional press. ResearchGate, DOI: 10.5817/BSE2014-1-1 .
Fitriani. (2017 :53). Analisis tindak tutur dalam novel marwah di ujung bara karya r.h. Fitriadi. Master Bahasa , 51-62.
Indarwati. (2019). Analisis elaboration likehood model dalam kalimat persuasi kampanye presiden 2019. Undas , 176.
Juwita, R. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dan Komisif Dalam Debat Calon. journal Eduscience
Lacone, S. (2003). Write to the Point: How to Communicate in Business With Style and Purpose. The United States of America: Career Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principle of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Liska Andrasari, M. A. Tindak Tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Pilkada Kabupaten Sambas Tahun 2015.Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Untan, Pontianak.
Mahsun. (2007 : 233). Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekninya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Prayitno, H. k. (2019). Realisasi tindak kesantunan pada komentar akun instagram Jokowi. Kandai .
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi linguistik. LITE, Volume 15 .
Samoškaitė, L. (2011). 21st Century Political Euphemism in English Newspaper.Lithuania: Vilnius Pedagogical University.
Sudaryanto. (1993 ). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sulistyono, Y. (2016 ). Struktur Dan Fungsi Eufemisme Dalam Rubrik Obituari Harian Kompas. LEKSEMA , 73-80.
Wiyanto, A. (2003). Debat Sebagai Retorika. Jakarta: Aneka Ilmu.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Pers
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991 ). Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language used as Shield and Weapon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Andrasari, L. (2017). Tindak tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Pilkada Kabupaten Sambas Tahun 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa Vol 6, No 4 .
Arif, N. F. (2015). Social and Cognitive Implications of Using Euphemisms in English. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 5, No. 6 , 151-156.
Astuti, A. (2016). Eufemisme bahasa pendukung Capres RI dalam akun Facebook:Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Universitas Andalas.
Austin, G. (1962). How To Do Things with words. Massachusetts: Harvad University Press Cambridge.
Brown, P. a. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burridge, K. (2012:76). Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and. Journal in English Lexicology , 65-92.
Burridge, K., & Allan, K. (2003). Taboo and the Censoring of language. New York: Cmabridge University Press.
Chaer, A. (1995). Sosiolinguistik : Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Citraresmana, E. (2019). Konsep makna kita dan kami dalam debat capres bulan Januari 2019: Kajian Semantik Kognitif melalui studi korpus. Metalingua, Vol. 18 No. 2 , 103-112.
Crespo Fernández, E. (2005). Euphemistic Strategies In Politeness And Face. Pragmalingüística, .
Dipodjojo, A. (1982 : 59). Komunikasi Lisan. Yogyakarta: P.D Lukman.
Fernandez, C. (2014). Euphemism and political discoursein the British regional press. ResearchGate, DOI: 10.5817/BSE2014-1-1 .
Fitriani. (2017 :53). Analisis tindak tutur dalam novel marwah di ujung bara karya r.h. Fitriadi. Master Bahasa , 51-62.
Indarwati. (2019). Analisis elaboration likehood model dalam kalimat persuasi kampanye presiden 2019. Undas , 176.
Juwita, R. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dan Komisif Dalam Debat Calon. journal Eduscience
Lacone, S. (2003). Write to the Point: How to Communicate in Business With Style and Purpose. The United States of America: Career Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principle of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Liska Andrasari, M. A. Tindak Tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Pilkada Kabupaten Sambas Tahun 2015.Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Untan, Pontianak.
Mahsun. (2007 : 233). Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekninya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Prayitno, H. k. (2019). Realisasi tindak kesantunan pada komentar akun instagram Jokowi. Kandai .
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Saifudin, A. (2019). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi linguistik. LITE, Volume 15 .
Samoškaitė, L. (2011). 21st Century Political Euphemism in English Newspaper.Lithuania: Vilnius Pedagogical University.
Sudaryanto. (1993 ). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sulistyono, Y. (2016 ). Struktur Dan Fungsi Eufemisme Dalam Rubrik Obituari Harian Kompas. LEKSEMA , 73-80.
Wiyanto, A. (2003). Debat Sebagai Retorika. Jakarta: Aneka Ilmu.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Pers
Published
2020-05-28
How to Cite
Wahyuningsih, W., & Nirmala, D. (2020). Perlocutionary Act of Euphemism in Indonesian Presidential Election Debate 2019. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.230
Section
Articles
