The Relevance of Adopting Proofreading Tools to Maintain Academic Writing Integrity and Coherence Text

  • Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
Keywords: Academic Writing, Coherence Text, Proofreading Tools, Writing Integrity


This study boasted some authors’ and editorial teams’ perspectives on academic integrity and adopting coherence properties, then using some Internet-based programs such as Mendeley, Grammar Checker, Turnitin, and coherence properties are considered as media options for 95 academicians such as authors, lecturers, even students, to produce acceptable works. With the correct and honesty of scientific works, then validity can be ensured. The data were figured out by adopting a descriptive qualitative design and compiled in consideration of 4 months, beginning from arranging pre-survey and post-survey in January to April 2022. The findings affirmed that Turnitin has many benefits to check sentences that consist of plagiarism, mark with different colors, and detect the source of website and copy-paste; to check plagiarism on the students’ tasks such as thesis, homework, article, and Mendeley presents some advantages to create a citation and reference manager used by the study and academician in citing references, especially from journals; to help them create bibliography and cite what they wrote; and to collect, arrange, share, and use the references related researches. Then Grammar Checker also provides some advantages, namely to check spelling, punctuation, and grammar structure automatically; to check the mistakes such as run-on sentences, accuracy, and consistency of the text. They employed the coherence pattern of deductive and inductive paragraphs containing complete elements of the claim, support, and warrant, including several strategies; definition strategy, comparative strategy, cause-effect, problem-solution strategy, means-end, listing, and partiting strategy. The results highlight that creating appropriate, standard scientific publications, adopting applicable coherence properties and contextual academic publishing were the requirements of an academician.

Author Biography

Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati, Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
English Eduacatio Department


Andayani, U. (2017). Penggunaan Software Turn It In untuk Mendeteksi Tindakan Plagiarisme. Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Informasi Perpustakaan, 16 (1), 33-40.
Badge, J.,& Scot, J. (2009). Dealing with plagiarism in the digital age. Literature Review: Independently Published Studies on Turnitin Services.
Caveleri H.M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You Want Me to Check Your Grammar Again? The Usefulness of an Online Grammar Checker as Perceived by Students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 16(1), 223-236.
Carlberger, J; Domeij. R., Kann. V., & Knutsson. O. (2004). The Development and Performance of a Grammar Checker for Swedish: A Language Engineering Perspective [Forthcoming Paper], Computational Linguistics Stockholm: Sweden.
Cheung, L.Y. (2018). The Influence of Coherence-Creating Mechanisms on the Development of Coherence in Expository Essays: A Case Study. Asian EFL Journal, 20 (4), 213-249.
Chen, E,C.F., & Cheng, E.W.Y. (2008). Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation Pedadogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12 (2), 94-112.
Chin L. H. (1991). Development of an English Grammar Checker: A Progress Report. CALICO Journal, 9(1), 1-4.
Crisp, G.T. (2007). Staff attitudes to dealing with plagiarism issues: Perspectives from one Australian University. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 3 (1),3-15.
Djamaris, A. R. A. (2017). Panduan Penggunaan Mendeley (Versi 1.17.10). Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Industry (JEMI), 32. 1227/1/panduan mendeley.pdf
Duigi, G. (2008).(2008). Essay Writing for English Test. Australia, Academic Press.
Eaton, E.S., & Edino, I.R. (2018). Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: a review of the research literature and call to action. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14 (50), 1-21.
Ebrahimi, S.F. (2014). The status of theme in the IELTS task 2 essay. Iran Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, 3, 339-397.
Ellis, C., Zucker,M.I, & Randall,D. (2018). The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14 (1), 1-21.
Fishman, T. (2009, 1-5). We know it when we see it is not good enough: toward a standard definition of plagiarism that transcends theft, fraud, and copyright [Paper Presentation]. 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity (4APCEI), University of Wollongong NSW Australia.
Gain, A., Rao, M., & Bhat,S. (2019). Usage of Grammarly-Online Grammar and Spelling Checker Tool at the Health Sciences Library,Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal: A Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 4 (17),1-13.
Ghufron,A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The Role of Grammarly in Assessing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing. Lingua Culture, 12 (4). 12i4.4582
Giustini,D. (2010). Mendeley-Manage, Share & Discover Research- HLWIKI Canada.,_Share_%26_Discover_Research.
Golden, J. L., Goodwin, F. Berquist, & William, E.C. (1976). The Rhetoric of Western Thought. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Gladwin. (2018). Educating students and future researchers about academic misconduct and questionable collaboration practices. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14 (10), 1-7.
Graham-Matheson, L., & Starr, S. (2013). Is it cheating or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism. Research in Learning Technology, 21(4), 1-7.
Hamilton,M., & Richards, J. (2008, 382-388). Academic integrity compliance and education [Paper Presentation]. Proceedings of ASCILITE Melbourne, Australia.
Heidorn, G.E. (2000). Intelligence Writing Assistance. In Dale R., Moisl H., and Somers H. (eds.), A Handbook of Natural Language Processing: Techniques and Applications for the Processing of Language as Text. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998 (published in August 2000), pages 181-207.
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment. In P. Hyland & A. Booth (Eds), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 233-247). Manchester University Press.
Ikart, E.M. (2017). Questionnaire Pretesting Methods: A Comparison of Cognitive Interviewing and Respondent Debriefing Vis-à-vis the Study of the Adoption of Decision Support Systems by Knowledge Workers. International Journal of Business and Information, 13(1), 119-154
Indiana University Bloomingtoon, Writing Tutorial Services. (2022). Plagiarism: What it is and How to Recognize and Avoid it.
Iskandar., & Patak, A.A. (2019). The Significance of Mendely Usage on the Accuracy of Citation and References. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 2 (4), 108-114.
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and Production Processes in Second Language Learning: In Search of the Psycholinguistic Rationale of the Output Hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24 (2), 168-196.
Jayavalan, K., Razali, M., & Abu B. (2018). Effectiveness of Online Grammar Checker to Improve Secondary Students’ English Narrative Essay Writing. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 2 (1), 1-6 .
Jayavalan,K. (2018). Effects of Grammarly Application on ESL Students’Construction of Grammatically Correct Sentences in Essay Writing [Unpublished Master Thesis], Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Jocoy, C.L. & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-16.
Johns, A.M. (1986). Coherence and academic writing: some definitions and suggestions for teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 247 – 2.
Kamayani, M., & Mugisidi, D. (2016, November 337-384). Information Technology Uses in Research: Best Practices and Recommendations [Paper Presentation]. Proceedings the 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia.
Karyuwatry, L., Rizqan, M.D.A., & Darayani, N.A. (2018). Grammarly as a Tool to Improve Students’ Writing Quality: Free Online-Proofreader Across the Boundaries. Edulitics Journal, 3 (1), 23-42.
Koshy, S. (2009). A case of miscommunication? Obstacles to the effective implementation of a plagiarism detection system in a multicultural university. [Working Paper Series]. University of Wollongong in Dubai (UOWD).
Ledwith, A., & Risquez,A. (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honestly in the context of peer reviewed assignment. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (4), 371-384.
McAvinia, C. (2006). Turnitin plagiarism prevention software: Pilot evaluation report summary. Quality Promotion Office. Nui Maynooth. sites/
McKay. T. M. (2014). Combating Plagiarism Using a Community of Practice Approach. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(4), 284-394.
Mendeley. (2022). Mendeley.
Morris, E. J. (2018). Academic integrity matters five considerations for addressing contract cheating. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(15), 1-12.
Mozgovoy, M. (2011, September 18-21). Dependency-Based Rules for Grammar Checking with Language Tool [Paper Presentation]. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information System (209-212). Szczecin, Poland.
Nova, M., & Utami, W. H. (2018). EFL students’ perception of Turnitin for detecting plagiarism in academic writing. International Journal of Education, 10(2), 141-148.
O’Neil, R., &Russel, A.M.T. (2019). Stop!Grammar Time: University Students’Perceptions of the Automated Feedback Program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Technology, 35 (1),42-56.
Perdana, I., & Farida, M. (2019). Online Grammar Checker and Their Use for EFL Writing. Journal of English Teaching, Linguistics and Literature (jetall), 2(2), 67-76.
Pratama, D.Y. (2020). The Investigation of Using Grammarly as Online Grammar Checker in the Process of Writing. English Ideas. Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 46-53.
Reiswig, J. (2010). Mendeley. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 98(2), 193-194.
Rohwer, A., Wager, E, Young, T., & Garner, P. (2018). Plagiarism in research: a survey of African Medical Journals. BMJ Open, 8 (11), 1-8. :10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-024777
Roig, M. (2006). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing.
Roig, M. (2014). Journal editorials on plagiarism: What is the message? European Science Editing, 40, 58-59.
Rusfandi. (2015). Argument-Counterargument Structure in Indonesia EFL Learners’ English Argumentative Essay: A Dialogue Concept of Writing. RELC Journal, 46 (2), 181-197.
Shahabuddin, S. (2009). Plagiarism in Academia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 353-359.
Shala,S., Leka, Dn & Morganella, T. (2018). Plagiarism in Kosovo: a case study of two public universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14 (12), 1-15.
Sisti. A.D. (2007). How Do High School Students Justify Internet Plagiarism? Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 215-231.
Stoesz & Yudintseva. (2018). Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: a synthesis paper. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14 (6). 1-22.
Stymne, S & Ahrenberg, L. (2010, May). Using a Grammar Checker for Evaluation and Post processing of Statistical Machine Translation [Paper Presentation]. Proceeding of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valetta, Malta, European Language Resource Association (ELRA).
Toulmin,S.E. (2003). The Uses of Argument Updated Edition, New York: Cambridge University.
Wang,Y., & Guo,M. (2014). A Short Analysis of Discourse Coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5 (2), 460-465. https:doi:10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465.
Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses. Assessment & Evaluation Higher Education, 31 (3), 379-394.
Yang, H. (2018). Efficiency of Online Grammar Checker in English Writing Performance and Students’Perceptions. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 18 (3).
Zeman, L.D., Steen, J. A., & Zeman, N. M. (2011). Originality detection software in a graduate policy course. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31(4), 431-441.
How to Cite
Nurhayati, D. (2022). The Relevance of Adopting Proofreading Tools to Maintain Academic Writing Integrity and Coherence Text. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 373-396.