Pattern Recognition of EFL University Students’ Online Behaviors through Data Science: Any Investment on English Language Components or Skills?

Maryam Arabshahi; Zeinab Kafi; Dennis Krummacker; Hans D. Schotten

doi:10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.758

Maryam Arabshahi Intelligent Networks Research Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Germany
Zeinab Kafi Khorasan Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
Dennis Krummacker Intelligent Networks Research Group, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Germany
Hans D. Schotten Institute for Wireless Communication and Navigation, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Germany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.758

Keywords: Data Science, EFL Students, Online Behaviors, Pattern Recognition, Wireless Network Traffic Data

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has played a crucial role in many fields of study, and its merits and demerits have been investigated by related scholars. However, it seems a somewhat gray area when implementing AI in teaching and learning. This could be mainly because AI developers know little about learning varied sciences and they also lack pedagogical knowledge for implementing AI in teaching (Luckin & Cukurova, 2019). Therefore, the current research aimed at gathering data regarding the online behaviors of 21 Iranian EFL university students through installing an application on their mobile phones for a period of eight days. Afterwards, the collected data were analyzed through Data Science methods and varied patterns of behavior were recognized. The results exhibited that messaging and social media applications are two great parts of the students’ life. Also, there existed some common patterns regarding the applications students owned and the amount of time they spent on them. As a small case in point, the results of the study cannot be generalized; however, the outcomes highlight the proof that in an EFL context, serious steps need to be adopted by course designers and stakeholders in order to cultivate a greater and purposeful use of online learning applications, websites etc. among EFL university students so as to enhance the teaching-learning process. This gains prominence because any AI-mediated learning approach is believed to enhance students’ second/foreign language motivation as well as self-regulation in learning. AI is actually promising a revolution in the realm of language education.

References

Borges, A. F., Laurindo, F. J., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2020). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225
Cohen, I. L., Liu, X., Hudson, M., Gillis, J., Cavalari, R. N., Romanc-zyk, R. G., ... & Gardner, J. M. (2017). Level 2 Screening with the PDD Behavior Inventory: Subgroup Profiles and Implications for Differential Diagnosis. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 32(3-4), 299-315. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 08295 73517 721127
Celik1, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H. & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends (2022) 66:616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Compe du.2013.04.013
EdTechXGlobal. (2016). EdTechXGlobal report 2016—Global EdTech industry report: a map for the future of education and work. Retrieved from http:// ecosy stem. edtec hxeur ope. com/ 2016-edtech-report
Gaudioso, E., Montero, M., & Hernandez-Del-Olmo, F. (2012). Supporting teachers in adaptive educational systems through predictive models: A proof of concept. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 621–625. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2011.07.052
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., and Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Comp. Educ. Art. Intel. 3:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., Arkenback, C., Ekström, S., Ericsson, E., Fransson, G., ... & Utterberg, M. (2019). Critical imaginaries and reflections on artificial intelligence and robots in post digital K-12 education. Post digital Science and Education, 1(2), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00046-x
Klímová, B. and Ibna Seraj, PM (2023) The use of chatbots in university EFL settings: Research trends and pedagogical implications. Front. Psychol. 14:1131506.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131506
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https:// doi. Org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., Gautam, D., Rus, V., & Williamson Shaffer, D. (2019). Understanding when students are active-in-thinking through modeling-in-context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2346–2364. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ bjet. 12869
Hsu, T.C., Chang, C. & Jen, T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies: effects on vocabulary acquisition, learning anxiety, and learning behaviors of English language learners, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508
Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chb. 2020.106643
Parwez, M. S., Rawat, D. B., & Garuba, M. (2017). Big data analytics for user-activity analysis and user-anomaly detection in mobile wireless network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(4), 2058-2065.
Bulut, E., & Szymanski, B. K. (2015, June). Understanding user behavior via mobile data analysis. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW) (pp. 1563-1568). IEEE.
Verkasalo, H. (2010, June). Analysis of smartphone user behavior. In 2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR) (pp. 258-263). IEEE.
Yang, J., Qiao, Y., Zhang, X., He, H., Liu, F., & Cheng, G. (2014). Characterizing user behavior in mobile internet. IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing, 3(1), 95-106.
Vojnovic, M. (2008, March). On mobile user behaviour patterns. In 2008 IEEE International Zurich Seminar on Communications (pp. 26-29). IEEE.
Xu, F., Li, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, P., & Jin, D. (2016). Understanding mobile traffic patterns of large scale cellular towers in urban environment. IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 25(2), 1147-1161.
Abbasi, M., Shahraki, A., & Taherkordi, A. (2021). Deep learning for network traffic monitoring and analysis (NTMA): A survey. Computer Communications, 170, 19-41.
Trinh, H. D., Giupponi, L., & Dini, P. (2018, September). Mobile traffic prediction from raw data using LSTM networks. In 2018 IEEE 29th annual international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1827-1832). IEEE.
Trinh, H. D., Bui, N., Widmer, J., Giupponi, L., & Dini, P. (2017, October). Analysis and modeling of mobile traffic using real traces. In 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Wirth, R., & Hipp, J. (2000, April). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on the practical applications of knowledge discovery and data mining (Vol. 1, pp. 29-39).
McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence.
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017). Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications. Expert systems with applications, 73, 220-239.